Remember how I mentioned our secretary who left for another department? (The one with the see-through bra?) Well I met her replacement today. Let’s call her Julie. She is a blonde in her mid-forties, perhaps a wee bit on the chunky side, but otherwise, very nice looking. I haven’t decided if I am going to add her to the list of hotties just yet. Anyway, as part of introductions, she mentioned her children, and pointed to a small picture tacked on the cubicle wall. It was a picture of three beautiful girls, ages 12, 7, and 4. What surprised me most was that I wasn’t surprised. In fact, I would have been completely surprised if she had sons.
And then I started to ponder for a bit: Is there a connection between a woman’s beauty and the gender of her children? I thought about my list of hotties and their children. Only three actually have children: Ashna has two daughters, ages 11 and 8. Hasna has two daughters, one 5 years old, and of course her 4 month old. Amy, the lone exception, has one son who is 19. Praveena, Maryanne, Ellen, and Michelle all have no children.
So then I thought of a few other women I know in the company:
- One woman, who works for Maryanne, has twin boys, age 5. She’s a nice person, but she is extremely plain looking. She very much has the “soccer mom” look — and not the hot kind. She even wears the high-rise pants that cover her navel.
- Linda, Hasna’s boss, has a daughter age 5 and a son age 2. She’s not bad either, but she too is very plain-looking. She also has no real personality.
- Another woman manager in our group has two grown boys, ages 24 and 20. She is certainly sociable and friendly, and I’m convinced that with a few drinks in her, I could score. But she also has the very plain soccer-mom look going for her.
- Another woman that I used to work with has a daughter age 14 and a son age 9. Now she’s cute. Not quite enough sexual energy to make the hottie list, but definitely cute.
I didn’t make any charts, but it seems that the hotties have daughters, and the non-hotties have sons. Why is that? Does a household full of boys cause a woman to “let herself go”? Perhaps these moms, in an effort to connect with their sons, intentionally (or subconsciously) lose interest in fashion, and instead become interested in things like sports, cars, and action figures. Or maybe it is that as parents, they are subconsciously demonstrating to their children what qualities are needed to eventually attract a mate. Do mothers of sons act more “manly,” in the hopes that their sons will pick up these behaviors? Is that why moms of daugthers keep up with fashion, makeup, and (sadly) dieting? Are they subliminally transmitting the necessary qualities that their daughters should learn?
A few Google searches turned up a study that suggested the reverse might be true: plain-looking people have sons, and hotties have daughters. Here’s a study by Dr. Satoshi Kanazawa that suggests beautiful people are 36% more likely to have daughters. To be honest, I think the article got the cause-and-effect backwards. After all, we all learned in school that it is the father’s DNA that determines the sex of the child. Yes, one might argue that the female ovum “admits” the type of sperm, but I don’t think so. I’m more convinced that it has more to do with raising sons than bearing them.
Nevertheless, it looks like there is some connection. Think about it: Barbara Bush had sons. Laura Bush had daughters. Who would you rather see naked?

